Prompt Perplexity
Understanding Galileo’s Prompt Perplexity Metrics
Definition: Measures the Prompt Perplexity, using the log probability’s provided by most models of the prompt.
Availability:
Perplexity can be calculated only with the LLM intergrations that provide log probabilities. Those are:
- OpenAI:
- Any Evaluate runs created from the Galileo Playground or with
pq.run(...)
, using the chosen model. - Any Evaluate workflow runs using
davinci-001
. - Any Observe worfklows using
davinci-001
.
- Any Evaluate runs created from the Galileo Playground or with
- Azure OpenAI:
- Any Evaluate runs created from the Galileo Playground or with
pq.run(...)
, using the chosen model. - Any Evaluate workflow runs
text-davinci-003
ortext-curie-001
, if they’re available in your Azure deployment. - Any Observe worfklows using
text-davinci-003
ortext-curie-001
, if they’re available in your Azure deployment.
- Any Evaluate runs created from the Galileo Playground or with
Calculation: Prompt Perplexity is calculated using OpenAI’s Davinci models. It is calculated as the exponential of the negative average of the log probability’s over the entire prompt. Thus it ranges from 0-infinity with lower values indicating the model on average was more certain of the next token in a sequence.
What to do when Prompt Perplexity is low?
Lower perplexity indicates your model is better tuned towards your data, as it can better predict the next token. Furthermore, the paper Demystifying Prompts in Language Models via Perplexity Estimation has shown that lower perplexity values in the input (aka. prompt) also lead to better outcomes in the generations (aka. results).
Was this page helpful?